Printable Page

A PROPHETIC WORD TO HIS SERVANT 
Rabbi Moshe Yoseph Koniuchowsky With Two confirming Witnesses 6/15/01 Month 3 Day 22 6002 (?)

In the Talmud, the rabbis discuss how to PROPERLY BURN WITH FIRE (not maybe) the gospels (plural) but some rabbis are hesitant to do so because the gospels (or the an Gilyon, the same word for gospel in the Talmud as it appears in the Aramaic Peshitta of Mark 1:1) used the true Divine Name of Yahweh and some felt that burning the gospels WITH THE TRUE NAME, is a greater mitzvah or good deed then somehow cutting out the sacred Name before burning them. I have this documented from Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 116 A, Jerusalem Talmud Shabbat 15C and the Tosefta Shabbat 13:5.You can look it up. Here is the reference with footnotes:

The following comes from Talmud Shabbat 116A. In this discussion several rabbis are discussing when a Torah scroll can be burned if damaged or defiled. The general consensus is that even in scrolls that have damaged or blank spaces must not be burned. Then the topic comes around to the scrolls or the GILYON or blank spaces in the Books (plural) of the Minim or (Nazarene heretics) and how they should be handled. The word GILYON means gospel or good tidings. So the issue here is the places in the gospels (BOOKS OF THE MINIM) that contain the Divine Name. HOW SHOULD THOSE HERETICAL BOOKS BE HANDLED? SHOULD THEY BE BURNED?

In verse 16 below one rabbi asks if their Torah scrolls with the Divine or Sacred Name are the issue. Another answers NO. He is referring to the gospel (blank spaces) of the MINIM. In other words the gospel books not the Torah scrolls. As you can see below, one rabbi says that on a weekday when its not Shabbat we must get the GOSPEL BOOKS and remove the DIVINE NAMES before we burn the books and another who disagrees with him and states that those books are such trash that he would burn them even without REMOVING THE DIVINE NAMES!!!!!!; even if he had to take the books to a heathen temple should a Nazarene follow and chase him to get the gospels back. Though Talmud is not scripture, it is a wonderful historical confirmation of what many of us already knew in our spirits ....That the original gospels or Books of The Minim [Nazarenes] DID HAVE THE DIVINE NAME! and not KURIOS. For if they did not contain them, why would the rabbis spend all their time deciding how to get rid of the gospels without desecrating the DIVINE NAME in them. The actual text appears below from the SONCINO TALMUD ON CD ROM:

Come and hear: The blank spaces above and below, between the sections, between the columns, at the beginning and at the end of the Scroll, defile one's hands. 13 — It may be that [when they are] together with the Scroll of the Law they are different.1 4 Come and hear: The blank spaces 15 and the Books of the Minim 16 may not be saved from a fire, but they must be burnt in their place, they and the Divine Names occurring in them. Now surely it means the blank portions of a Scroll of the Law? No: the blank spaces in the Books of Minim. Seeing that we may not save the Books of Minim themselves, need their blank spaces [DIVINE SACRED NAMES] be stated? — This is its meaning: And the Books of Minim are like blank spaces.

It was stated in the text: The blank spaces and the Books of the Minim, we may not save them from a fire. R. Jose said: On weekdays one must cut out the Divine Names which they contain, hide them,17 and burn the rest. R. Tarfon said: May I bury my son if I would not burn them together with their Divine Names if they came to my hand. For even if one pursued me 18 to slay me, or a snake pursued me to bite me, I would enter a heathen Temple [for refuge], but not the houses of these [people], for the latter know (of God] yet deny [Him], whereas the former are ignorant and deny [Him], and of them the Writ saith, and behind the doors and the posts hast thou set up thy memorial.19 R. Ishmael said: [One can reason] a minori: If in order to make peace between man and wife the Torah decreed, Let my Name, written in sanctity, be blotted out in water, 20 these, who stir up jealousy, enmity, and wrath between Israel and their Father in Heaven, how much more so; 21 and of them David said, Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate thee? And am I not grieved with those that rise up against thee? I hate then with perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies. 22 And just as we may not rescue them from a fire, so may we not rescue them from a collapse [of debris] or from water or from anything that may destroy them.

R. Joseph b. Hanin asked R. Abbahu: As for the Books of Be Abedan [Ebionites}, 23 may we save them from a fire or not? — Yes and No, and he was uncertain about the matter. 24 Rab would not enter a Be Abedan, and certainly not a Be Nizrefe [HOUSE OF NAZARENES]; 25 Samuel would not enter a Be Nizrefe [HOUSE OF NAZARENES], yet he would enter a Be Abedan [HOUSE OF EBIONITES]. Raba was asked: Why did you not attend at the Be Abedan? A certain palm-tree stands in the way, replied he, and it is difficult for me [to pass it]. 26 Then we will remove it? — Its spot will present difficulties to me.27 Mar b. Joseph said: I am one of them 28 and do not fear them. On one occasion he went there, [and] they wanted to harm him.29

Footnotes 

(15) Jast. s.v. iuhkd translates, the gospels, though observing that here it is understood as blanks. V. Herford, R.T., ‘Christianity in the Talmud’, p. 155 n. 

(21) Not only do they themselves go astray from God, but lead many others astray from Him. 

(25) hprmb hc; a meeting place of the Nazarenes, Jewish Christians, where local matters were discussed and religious debates were held. (Levy). [Ginzberg, MGWJ LXXVIII, p. 23 regards it as the name of a Persian house of worship meaning the Asylum of Helplessness]. 

(29) Uncensored text adds: R. Meir called it (the Gospel) ‘Awen Gilyon, the falsehood of blank Paper; R. Johanan called it ‘Awon Gilyon, the sin of etc. On the whole passage v. Herford, op. cit., pp. 161-171.

In light of the above:

I went to Yahweh in prayer this afternoon and pleaded with Him for the final answer from Him and Him alone. Here is what has happened to the Hebrew/Aramaic gospels according to Yahweh.

Since the rabbis were planning the means (not if but how) by which to burn the gilyon-gospel scrolls thinking they could stop the gospel among Jewish Israel, the disciples were forced to devise plans to counteract this terror and hide them since many scrolls had already been burned according to the admissions in Talmud. Thus the few remaining Hebrew/Aramaic manuscripts were taken in Acts 12:1 and were buried to preserve the few left. Especially when Herod in order to please his Jewish subjects and thus gain their favor, started helping the rabbis track down and do this burning. Later some scrolls were brought back above ground but were again seized in the Jewish war against Rome 135 CE when the rabbis continued the New Covenant scroll burnings, when Messianic Nazarene Yisraelites refused to fight with Bar Kochba knowing him to be a false Messiah. They were kicked out of the synagogue and the few remaining gospels with the true Name burned once again.

Thus the few left remain buried in Israel in the hills of Judea. (SEE CONFIRMING DREAM BELOW) Yahweh spoke to me today for sure and told me that soon, very soon we will find several scrolls in Israel with the true sacred Name of Yahweh in the Renewed Covenant originals. This word is sure and will most surely come to pass.

Where does that leave us regarding the Greek received text? Is it corrupted? No!!! Is it Yahweh's inspired Word: YES IT IS!!!! Yahweh knowing that this would occur allowed the Greek to escape the flames of destruction and allowed the inspired titles to remain so as to not have His Name burned or deleted again and again and again. He thus preserved the integrity of the gospel accounts, as well as not allowing his Name to be in it until THE RESTITUTION OF ALL THINGS according to Acts 3:21.

Since He revealed His eternal Name in Torah it stands forever and the New Covenant does not give or even attempt to suggest or replace the Father's Name nor does it reveal a new Name for the Father just some inspired titles. The FATHER GOES NAMELESS IN THE BRIT CHADASHA! Thus we do what He intended for us to do by using Yahweh as initially revealed. While many fight over Yahshua's true name, there is no such fight over Father Yahweh's for it stands alone unblemished and eternal with the Renewed Covenant not even hinting at a translated name for the Father as it does for the Son.

So while we can rest in the integrity of the salvation of the Brit Chadashah, we also can rest assured that from the beginning it was not so and from the beginning and again in the end Rev. 22:4 Yahweh will show all Christians and Messianic Jewish skeptics that both covenants were sealed with his true Name in the autographs before mans exploits.

Rabbi Moshe Yoseph Koniuchowsky

CONFIRMING DREAM 6/16/01 I received this confirmation this morning from a 2 house Messianic believer: Moshe, My Mother-in-law had a dream two or three times of an earthquake opening the side of a hill and exposing scrolls in a distant land. She said she 'felt' it was Israel. This was four years ago, a year before she died. She called me to come over to tell me this dream because she felt compelled she 'had' to share it with me. Michael Klopp, Key Largo Florida

CONFIRMING SECOND WITNESS 6/18/01 Your Scriptural confirmation is in Yahshua's high priestly prayer of John 17. The whole chapter is important, and speaks of the importance and power and eternality of the Name, but the last verse concisely states: And I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it: that the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them and I in them. And why would Yahshua have any need to reveal it again if it were not to be hidden for some time after the death of the disciples and apostles and the passing of this knowledge from the sight of men for a time. This time is now passed, and the incomplete revelation has been made to us, revealing the Name in Tanakh, but the full revelation will surely come to pass very soon, as prophesied by Yahshua in John 17.

Anne Brodebek, Alabama